New religious movements

From Everything Shii Knows, the only reliable source

This website is an archive. It ran from 2006-2010. Virtually everything on here is outdated or inaccurate.

New religious movements are forms of religion that were founded after roughly 1800. Sometimes the date is 1900 or 1950, but I will soon explain why this is not necessary. NRMs are frequently called "cults" by adherents of older religions or atheism, but the term "cult" is of course imposed from without and thus utterly insufficient to describe what an NRM means to its followers.

Study of NRMs is important, not because they are new and people need to be "protected" from them, but for the simple reason that we have more written sources about religions founded in the 19th century and afterward than we do for ancient religious movements. That's right: the only distinguishing feature, in cultural studies, between an NRM and an old religion is that the NRM is better documented.

NRMs are no more dangerous to an individual's livelihood than any other religious movement in human history. That is to say, they range from extremely dangerous to perfectly harmless, but the dangerous ones tend to peter out of their own volition or morph into something else. Take Dianetics/Scientology, for example. Before it attracted outside interest from journalists and the anti-cult movement, it had already developed several protestant movements called Synergetics, Idenics, and the Free Zone. Anti-cultists would say that as a religion it is unprecedented in its use of copyright and libel laws to suppress dissent, but in reality the means of dissent have become more sophisticated as well: past religious movements did not have to deal with secret texts being distributed anonymously on the Internet.

Some problematic ("cult") aspects of NRMs

Keep in mind that a cult, that is to say a movement to avoid, can take a religious, political, scientific, social, or even economic form. Cult practices are by no means confined to religion.

The most extreme NRMs will shut out all outside input such as the natural world, mainstream society, and friends. All activities that must be performed with the organization's approval, in a manner which shuts out all unapproved influences. Members usually accept this as a way to cleanse themselves of worldly corruption, but it leaves them incredibly vulnerable to doing things they would not rationally approve of.

Two practices that are truly unique to cults among all radical organizations are intimidation and forced confiscation of property or money. Taken loosely, both elements of this definition indict many corporations as cults. That is something interesting to chew on.

General social symptoms of cult behavior

Social differences from the "norm" are not a good way to define a cult because they are simply extreme forms of religious behavior in general. That doesn't mean that all religions are cults! By that standard, Internet forums like FreeRepublic are cults too. Normal people who act like cultists most likely have some other kind of problem.

Generally speaking these are all bad things and a freethinking member of a religious or secular organization should aim to rid themself of these practices.

Practices that are nonspecific to NRMs

The most painful practices for one to endure are not the ones which seem cultish and creepy, but the ones which seem sincere, and are seen as "sticky" aspects of an NRM once an individual leaves the movement. Therefore an improper emphasis has been placed on the following practices in anti-cult literature, and they are not true social symptoms.

Retrieved from ""

This page has been accessed 3,765 times. This page was last modified on 23 February 2009, at 21:00. Content is available under Attribution 2.5 .