Brahmanical See is a hoax that was created on Wikipedia. The hoax included fake references, which caused idiot Wikipedia admins to ban a good-intentioned user who tried to get the hoax deleted.
Contents |
Analysis
The successful propagation of this hoax basically worked like any other content manipulation on Wikipedia. First, a user unfamiliar with the inner workings of Wikipedia noticed the article was utterly false and tried to tell people so. Then, Wikipedians who were "unsure" if it was true or not reversed the newbie's attempt to get rid of it. Finally, a malicious user familiar with how Wikipedia works (who apparently hates Hinduism or something) kicked the newbie around and eventually got him permanently banned, simply for trying to fix a major mistake.
Original hoax article
Brahmanical See refers to the domain of certain Hindu leaders in the Indian subcontinent. Because it is essentially an anglicized term, this nomenclature has begun to fall into disuse.
Much like the former Indian principalities, which varied in scale from small estates to vast kingdoms, the brahmanical sees range from minor parishes to quasi-states.
With Hinduism itself lacking any central organizing institutions, it is common for brahmanical sees to geographically overlap with one another, just as the sees of different Christian denominations can coexist within a shared geography.
A religious leader over a Brahmanical See is typically known as a "maharaj", or in European terms, a "prince of the faith". The office is generally passed down the generations in the male line within an extended family, though not necessarily from father to son.
Again, similar to the tensions which existed in medieval Europe between the papacy and the aristocracy, tensions between the brahmanical maharajs and the royal maharajas furnished the main political narrative in many parts of India. The brahmanical maharajs could bestow or withhold the legitimacy without which royal maharajas could not reign, and the royal maharajas could extend or withdraw the military protection without which brahmanical maharajs might not survive.
The longest established brahmanical sees are the Brahmanical See of Rajasthan (which contains a large number of kingdoms), the Brahmanical See of Mysore (whose borders are coterminal with those of the Kingdom of Mysore), and the Brahmanical See of Dabra (which is one of several sees contained within the Kingdom of Gwalior).
With the dissolution of the old kingdoms and the coming of modernity, the importance of the brahmanical sees declined sharply in the last quarter century. The see of Rajasthan is now held by an Indo-Canadian, the see of Mysore is disputed by three claimants, and the see of Dabra has been allowed to lapse entirely.
Fake references added by single-use account "Cite Machine"
- "Brahmanical Ideology, Regional Identities and the Construction of Early India", Social Scientist, Vol. 29-7, Bhairabi Prasad Sahu
- Brahmanism and Hinduism, Sir Monier Monier Williams, 1891
- "Brahmans and the Legitimation of Hindu Kingship", Man, New Series, Vol. 27-4, Norbert Peabody, C. J. Fuller, Adrian C. Mayer
These are all real articles but they do not mention the hoax term "Brahmanical see".
Banned user's talk page
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Nexxt_1&oldid=187696555
Banned user's Block log
- 23:17, 4 December 2007 Nlu (Talk | contribs | block) blocked "Nexxt 1 (Talk | contribs)" (account creation blocked) with an expiry time of indefinite (Vandalism) (Unblock)
- 08:30, 19 October 2007 Caknuck (Talk | contribs | block) blocked "Nexxt 1 (Talk | contribs)" (account creation blocked) with an expiry time of 1 week (Disruptive editing) (Unblock)
- 16:29, 8 October 2007 Persian Poet Gal (Talk | contribs | block) blocked "Nexxt 1 (Talk | contribs)" (account creation blocked) with an expiry time of 24 hours (repeatedly vandalizing the Brahmanical See article and inserting unsource edits) (Unblock)
Log
Here is the history log of the page, which you cannot read on Wikipedia anymore because it has been hidden from the public (read from bottom to top)
- 05:22, 22 January 2008 (diff) . . SmackBot (Talk | contribs | block) (2,526 bytes) (Date/fix the maintenance tags or gen fixes using AWB)
- 18:33, 21 January 2008 (diff) . . Thinboy00 (Talk | contribs | block) (2,508 bytes) (rm redundant Template:Disputed, move Template:Hoax to look better)
- 18:15, 21 January 2008 (diff) . . HisSpaceResearch (Talk | contribs | block) (2,520 bytes) (hoax tag)
- 16:47, 21 January 2008 (diff) . . Zenwhat (Talk | contribs | block) (2,512 bytes) (Oops, didn't mean to put that in there!)
- 16:47, 21 January 2008 (diff) . . Zenwhat (Talk | contribs | block) (2,564 bytes) (AfD: Nominated for deletion; see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brahmanical See)
- 03:15, 21 January 2008 (diff) . . Utcursch (Talk | contribs | block) (2,187 bytes) (accuracy disputed -- see talk page; no refs)
- 04:01, 20 January 2008 (diff) . . Rudrasharman (Talk | contribs | block) (2,171 bytes) (reduce this to unreferenced OR, which is actually what this article is)
- 04:00, 20 January 2008 (diff) . . Rudrasharman (Talk | contribs | block) (2,179 bytes) (bogus reference, see talk page)
- 04:00, 20 January 2008 (diff) . . Rudrasharman (Talk | contribs | block) (2,341 bytes) (bogus reference, see talk page)
- 03:20, 20 January 2008 (diff) . . Rudrasharman (Talk | contribs | block) (2,508 bytes) (and Shivaji, for example, did what about this?)
- 03:18, 20 January 2008 (diff) . . Rudrasharman (Talk | contribs | block) (2,486 bytes) (sounds completely bogus)
- 00:38, 20 January 2008 (diff) . . Utcursch (Talk | contribs | block) (2,464 bytes) (try WP:AfD prod cannot be used once it has been removed: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Brahmanical_See&diff=174393300&oldid=174349214)
- 21:46, 19 January 2008 (diff) . . Rudrasharman (Talk | contribs | block) (2,756 bytes) (prod - neologism, original research, unsourced descriptions and conclusions)
- 21:42, 19 January 2008 (diff) . . Rudrasharman (Talk | contribs | block) (2,464 bytes) (inadequate reference: where in this 600 p book can this extraordinary claim be found?)
- 20:39, 4 December 2007 (diff) . . UsaSatsui (Talk | contribs | block) (2,528 bytes) (rv)
- 20:38, 4 December 2007 (diff) . . UsaSatsui (Talk | contribs | block) (3,062 bytes) (Stop.)
- 18:52, 4 December 2007 (diff) . . Nexxt 1 (Talk | contribs | block) (3,340 bytes) (you have no references!)
- 17:45, 3 December 2007 (diff) . . Devout (Talk | contribs | block) (2,528 bytes) (Undo vandalism)
- 16:51, 3 December 2007 (diff) . . Nexxt 1 (Talk | contribs | block) (3,340 bytes) (discuss on discussion what vandalism is on this article exactly - this article makes ridiculous comments with NO REFERENCE!!!!!!)
- 19:44, 2 December 2007 (diff) . . Devout (Talk | contribs | block) (2,528 bytes) (Undid -- Clear case of vandalism, and backdating of a "prod" tag)
- 18:51, 2 December 2007 (diff) . . Goldenhawk 0 (Talk | contribs | block) (3,340 bytes) (rv - you cannot delete wiki material u vandal)
- 10:20, 28 November 2007 (diff) . . UsaSatsui (Talk | contribs | block) (2,528 bytes) (rv back to a clean version)
- 10:18, 28 November 2007 (diff) . . UsaSatsui (Talk | contribs | block) (3,062 bytes) (This is obviously not a prod)
- 05:39, 28 November 2007 (diff) . . SmackBot (Talk | contribs | block) (3,340 bytes) (Date/fix the maintenance tags or gen fixes using AWB)
- 20:36, 27 November 2007 (diff) . . Goldenhawk 0 (Talk | contribs | block) (3,220 bytes) (i've read this book and the term appears nowhere in it!!!)
- 07:41, 19 October 2007 (diff) . . Devout (Talk | contribs | block) (2,528 bytes) (rv vandalism)
- 05:38, 19 October 2007 (diff) . . SmackBot (Talk | contribs | block) (3,015 bytes) (Date/fix the maintenance tags or gen fixes)
- 19:19, 18 October 2007 (diff) . . SmileToday (Talk | contribs | block) (2,910 bytes) (removed prod, take it to WP:AFD, (prod has not been in place on page continuously for 5 days))
- 17:33, 18 October 2007 (diff) . . Nexxt 1 (Talk | contribs | block) (3,220 bytes) (reverted to last version by 207.69.137.21)
- 12:26, 18 October 2007 (diff) . . Devout (Talk | contribs | block) (2,528 bytes) (Yes, the sources are reliable: peer reviewed academic journals)
- 06:47, 18 October 2007 (diff) . . SmackBot (Talk | contribs | block) (3,325 bytes) (Date/fix the maintenance tags or gen fixes)
- 21:14, 17 October 2007 (diff) . . 207.69.137.21 (Talk | block) (3,220 bytes) (flagged many uncited claims)
- 20:41, 17 October 2007 (diff) . . Nexxt 1 (Talk | contribs | block) (3,056 bytes) (rv and has the article been improved? are the souces reliable?)
- 20:45, 15 October 2007 (diff) . . Devout (Talk | contribs | block) (2,528 bytes) (The wiki tag itself states, "You may remove this message if you improve the article or otherwise object to its deletion for any reason")
- 15:10, 15 October 2007 (diff) . . Nexxt 1 (Talk | contribs | block) (3,056 bytes) (you are vandalizing the article, you cannot delete a Wiki tag)
- 16:45, 13 October 2007 (diff) . . Devout (Talk | contribs | block) (2,528 bytes) (added back template)
- 16:44, 13 October 2007 (diff) . . Devout (Talk | contribs | block) (2,508 bytes)
- 16:44, 13 October 2007 (diff) . . Devout (Talk | contribs | block) (2,539 bytes) (Removed inserted section that contradicts the rest of the article. Removed improperly formatted "Page number". Object to deletion, therefore removing template as per its instructions.)
- 11:59, 13 October 2007 (diff) . . Nexxt 1 (Talk | contribs | block) (3,056 bytes)
- 11:56, 13 October 2007 (diff) . . Nexxt 1 (Talk | contribs | block) (2,841 bytes)
- 11:54, 13 October 2007 (diff) . . Nexxt 1 (Talk | contribs | block) (2,717 bytes)
- 11:50, 13 October 2007 (diff) . . Nexxt 1 (Talk | contribs | block) (2,677 bytes) (References: removed defunct category)
- 11:47, 13 October 2007 (diff) . . Nexxt 1 (Talk | contribs | block) (2,703 bytes) (added new categories and added to introduction, and removed template (which has nothing to do with the article))
- 16:07, 8 October 2007 (diff) . . Devout (Talk | contribs | block) (2,527 bytes) (rv - vandalism in violation of final warning as per wikipedia guidelines)
- 14:22, 8 October 2007 (diff) . . Nexxt 1 (Talk | contribs | block) (180 bytes) (rv - its not vandalism because 'brahmanical see' is just not any existant TERM!)
- 08:53, 8 October 2007 (diff) . . Devout (Talk | contribs | block) (2,527 bytes) (rv vandalism)
- 22:10, 7 October 2007 (diff) . . Nexxt 1 (Talk | contribs | block) (180 bytes) (there are still no references, you can't just add a couple of texts and cal them references, they dont even have the racist term!)
- 21:16, 6 October 2007 (diff) . . Devout (Talk | contribs | block) (2,527 bytes) (The references are well documented and fully listed. Stop vandalising this page.)
- 20:50, 6 October 2007 (diff) . . Nexxt 1 (Talk | contribs | block) (180 bytes)
- 20:49, 6 October 2007 (diff) . . Nexxt 1 (Talk | contribs | block) (208 bytes) (this is your bias, there is not mention in any material, try to find an online word, provide the context)
- 21:40, 5 October 2007 (diff) . . Devout (Talk | contribs | block) (2,527 bytes) (All three references use the phrase "Brahmanical See". Try reading them instead of making false statements.)
- 13:23, 5 October 2007 (diff) . . Nexxt 1 (Talk | contribs | block) (208 bytes) (rv - indeed there are references but none of them even declare a 'Brahminical See", Hindu see would be more appropriate)
- 05:42, 5 October 2007 (diff) . . Devout (Talk | contribs | block) (2,527 bytes) (All references are listed in the "References" section of this article. Look them up. They are all scholarly, peer-reviewed articles.)
- 00:21, 5 October 2007 (diff) . . Nexxt 1 (Talk | contribs | block) (208 bytes) (you are merely adding your own racist versions. There article does not make sense as the term does not exist! you have many references you say? Where)
- 19:49, 4 October 2007 (diff) . . Devout (Talk | contribs | block) (2,527 bytes) (The article is fully indexed, unlike what you are trying to replace it with. You have no references, this article has many.)
- 16:51, 4 October 2007 (diff) . . Nexxt 1 (Talk | contribs | block) (208 bytes) (but no such term exists in history! Wikipedia cannot print false facts, everything must be referenced behave with Wikipedian civility!)
- 07:15, 2 October 2007 (diff) . . Cite Machine (Talk | contribs | block) (2,527 bytes) (Added references section)
- 07:12, 2 October 2007 (diff) . . Cite Machine (Talk | contribs | block) (2,497 bytes) (Added necessary references)
- "Cite Machine" was a single-use account, that is to say, it was created specifically to edit this article and edited no other articles.
- 06:40, 2 October 2007 (diff) . . Devout (Talk | contribs | block) (2,140 bytes) (Vote held in May (see history) has already decided that the article remains. You can not unilaterally reverse a decision made by the Wikipedia community.)
- The "vote" was a "delete this page" tag which was added by one user and removed by another because it seemed "non-convincing".
- 22:37, 1 October 2007 (diff) . . Nexxt 1 (Talk | contribs | block) (208 bytes) (rv - page was not completly blanked. Plus this is not eve a real term, it is lke saying 'mujhahadeenical see')
- 16:58, 29 September 2007 (diff) . . Devout (Talk | contribs | block) (2,140 bytes) (Complete blanking of a page, and replacement with a biased term, violates Wikipedia terms)
- 19:44, 28 September 2007 (diff) . . Nexxt 1 (Talk | contribs | block) (208 bytes) (added internal links)
- 19:43, 28 September 2007 (diff) . . Nexxt 1 (Talk | contribs | block) (154 bytes) (NO REFERENCES FOR PREVIOUS MATERIAL WAS GIVEN AT ALL!!!)
- 05:15, 24 May 2007 (diff) . . SJK (Talk | contribs | block) (2,140 bytes) (oppose prod - reasons given for prod seem non-convincing to me; suggest AFDing if still want deleted)
- 07:03, 19 May 2007 (diff) . . Tizio (Talk | contribs | block) (2,452 bytes) (fixing prod)
- 14:42, 18 May 2007 (diff) . . Neel0110 (Talk | contribs | block) (2,149 bytes) (added proposed deletion tag for racism in content (e.g. there is no such term))
- 14:39, 18 May 2007 (diff) . . NawlinWiki (Talk | contribs | block) (2,140 bytes) (Reverted edits by DeletionBOT (talk) to last version by STBot)
- 14:39, 18 May 2007 (diff) . . DeletionBOT (Talk | contribs | block) (89 bytes) (←Replaced page with 'This is a make-up fake term that neo-Buddhists and other anti-Brahmins are trying to use.')
- 21:06, 14 October 2006 (diff) . . STBot (Talk | contribs | block) (clean up - bother me at my talk if I mess up using AWB)
- 12:39, 7 June 2006 (diff) . . Devout (Talk | contribs | block) (added Hinduism box)
- 12:16, 11 May 2006 (diff) . . Devout (Talk | contribs | block) (added link)
- 20:15, 26 April 2006 (diff) . . 69.22.252.216 (Talk | block)
- 01:54, 8 April 2006 (diff) . . Dangerous-Boy (Talk | contribs | block) (changed cat)
- 20:45, 7 April 2006 (diff) . . CalJW (Talk | contribs | block) (adjusted categorisation)
- 16:26, 22 March 2006 (diff) . . CharacterZero (Talk | contribs | block) (cap, link)
- 14:35, 18 March 2006 (diff) . . Dangerous-Boy (Talk | contribs | block) (+Cat)
- 15:55, 30 August 2004 (diff) . . 209.47.231.226 (Talk | block) (M inserted link)
- 01:53, 4 August 2004 (diff) . . 80.229.39.194 (Talk | block) (episcopal see)
- 01:49, 4 August 2004 . . 207.188.66.207 (Talk | block) (New Entry)